tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6590358285673767171.post5579056582764062786..comments2023-05-28T17:47:26.943-07:00Comments on A Nice Place To Live: Art ConsequentialismAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08064363064872625529noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6590358285673767171.post-74197436991967718452014-01-27T10:16:29.280-08:002014-01-27T10:16:29.280-08:00Yup, it is. But if you think this argument would b...Yup, it is. But if you think this argument would be unappealing to people that hold art sacred, imagine how "art utilitarianism" would sound to them.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08064363064872625529noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6590358285673767171.post-50473856675453402432014-01-27T06:58:10.858-08:002014-01-27T06:58:10.858-08:00Art for art's sake could be a consequentialist...Art for art's sake could be a consequentialist position too. It would value the consequence of creating more art that possessed certain properties other than its effects on conscious experience. Your position seems to be more specifically art utilitarianism.Brian Tomasikhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10510289096715716609noreply@blogger.com